

Pierre J. Tremblay
Presented
at the Sixth Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Suicide
Prevention, Banff, Alberta, October 11-14, 1995, (c) Oct 1995. First made
available on the Internet on January 19, 1996.
The Gay and Bisexual
Male Attempted Suicide Problem: 1930-1995
Dead GLB people don't talk, but GLB survivors of a suicide attempt may
tell us their story. The first scientific study to suggest/reveal that
GLB people have been at higher risk that heterosexual people for having
had a suicide attempt problem was carried out by Bell & Weinberg (1978)
on the basis of white(W) / black (B), male (M) / female (F), predominantly
homosexual (H) / predominantly heterosexual (HT) samples of adult individuals.
Most participants ranged in age between 18 and 55, and the average age
of white males was about 36.5 years. Therefore, the data producing attempted
suicide rates (given as a percentage of the sampled population to a certain
age) reflects what the GLB youth attempted suicide rates were in the San
Francisco Bay Area between about 1930 to 1970, the averaged results best
representing the situation existing around 1950 (Note
3).
The result of the Bell & Weinberg (1978) study are often noted in
research papers and articles, usually by stating that gay males are six-times
more likely to attempt suicide than heterosexual males, and that lesbian
are two-times more likely to attempt suicide than heterosexual females.
Occasionally, it is mentioned that the risk for suicide attempts is highest
during adolescence, but the risk is not quantified. Figures 1-3 show the
attempted suicide rates to the ages of 17, 20, and 25, respectively, for
all groups studied, yielding the conclusion that, to the age of
17 20 25
predominantly homosexual males were
14 TIMES 13.9 TIMES 6 TIMES
more likely to have attempted suicide than their heterosexual counterparts
randomly chosen and matched on the basis of age and education level.
The Bell & Weinberg data therefore suggests
that, to a significant degree, predominantly gay males have been over-represented
in the population of male suicide attempters from 1930 to 1970, and that
the proportion varies depending on the estimate for predominantly homosexual
males in the male population. For example, to the age of 25, homosexual
males would account for 40%, 25%, or 14% of male suicide attempters if
these males are assumed to form 10%, 5%, or 2.5% respectively of the male
population; 56%, 41%, or 26% of male suicide attempters to the age of 20,
and 64%, 46%, or 29% of male suicide attempters to the age of 17 depending
on the same percentage of population estimates. For reasons noted in Appendix
A, it is estimated that about 5% of the male population is predominantly
homosexual and it is therefore concluded, on the basis of the Bell &
Weinberg data, that predominantly homosexual males have formed 46% (to
the age of 17), 41% (to the age of 20), and 25% (to the age of 25) of males
who have attempted suicide (Note 4).
Since 1970, a number of studies of gay and bisexual male youth (23-33,
36-37), with or without lesbian and bisexual females, have consistently
reported high attempted suicide rates ranging from 20 to 50 percent (Table
1,
2, 3, and 4)
for these youth. As a rule, the samples were community based, thus representing
some of the North American GLB youth who have made a direct connection
with GLB communities and related services. Therefore, as it was emphasized
by Savin-Williams(1994), "[s]ocial science research does not allow us to
generalize these findings to all bisexual, gay males, and lesbian youth,
primarily because most of these youths are not 'out' to themselves and
to others" (35:367).
This caveat is important, and the same has been said about the Bell
& Weinberg(1978) study. In this case, however, the total volunteer
sample [The "biased" samples referred to by Moscicki, 1995 (14:32)]
of white male homosexuals was large, from which a smaller sample of 575
white males was selected (23:11). Many facts were
taken into considerations in this process, including the reality that the
gay community was (and still is) very cellular in nature. I was therefore
able to conclude, on the basis of my own extensive knowledge of gay communities,
that their sample was probably the most representative one ever taken of
a large gay community.
Many problems have been noted with respect to all research results on
GLB people, ranging from the representative nature of samples studied to
their actual percentage of the population. These problems, however, should
not be an issue for all professionals working with youth such as teachers,
school counsellors, mental health professionals, pediatricians, or other
professionals working in youth problem prevention/intervention fields such
as drug and alcohol abuse and suicide. Beyond any doubt, it is a fact that
GLB youth (and adults) exist, although their exact percentage of the total
population remains to be determined (Appendix
A).
Many GLB youth do attempt suicide, and some succeed. Like heterosexual
youth with suicide problems, GLB youth also have elevated rates of substance
abuse problems, but with a difference. The recurring single most important
factor implicated in GLB youth problems (including drug and alcohol abuse)
is the acknowledgement of their homosexual desires/nature/orientation and
the multiple problems predictably resulting from this, and from also "coming
out" to others, because they have grown up and are living in a traditionally
homophobic, homohating, and homo-punitive society (Note
5).
In spite of having such information, researcher of youth suicide problems
have always avoided obtaining sexual desire/behaviour/ orientation data
from samples of youth studied, even when all the cumulating research, especially
with respect to attempted suicides, has strongly suggested that GLB youth
are at high risk for having suicide problems. The same indifference has
also existed in most suicide prevention programs which have typically excluded
any mention of GLB youth and what is known about them. This knowledge is
now available in books, articles, and research papers largely written by
professionals who have worked with these often highly distressed and suicidal
youth. Therefore, it would appear that factors other than scientific principles
are implicated in Suicidology's general indifference to GLB youth.
In the final analysis, it would seem that most suicidologists will continue
to ignore sexual orientation issues for as long as it is believed that
GLB youth are not at higher risk for suicide attempts and suicide, compared
to heterosexual youth. So what percentage of the attempted suicide problems
will it take before suicide prevention experts begin to note, in a comprehensive
manner, in their papers and books (Note 6).
and in booklets and pamphlets written for youth and their parents (Note
7). that homosexual orientation is a factor in the youth suicide
problem? 10%? 20%? 30%? 40%? 50%?