|
pierre@youth-suicide.com |
The 1999 Oregon YRBS Results |
Web-Link GLBT Education |
![]() |
1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey Serious Problems For Adolescents Subjected to Anti-Homosexual Harassment |
![]() |
I was first exposed to the hatred felt by many against gay individuals while growing up in a very small city, in southern Ontario. I was 13, and in grade eight at the time, and a new kid in school was labeled a "faggot" by the "in crowd" for no apparent reason. This was my first introduction to both the definition of the word, and to the fear that I slowly developed for anyone whom I suspected of being gay.
"Boys
Will Be Boys": How "masculinity" in American culture
affects
safety in our schools.
Adolescent suicide related to anti-gay harassment? Yes, but if the boy who killed himself was also having problems with being homosexually oriented - which is not known - his parents highly negative attitudes with respect to possibly having had a "gay" son may have factored into the boy's death:
Murders associated with Anti-gay harassment? Boys who don't conform to a set standard of masculine behavior and appearance -- who don't play contact sports, for example, or who are short or slight -- risk being ostracized as "sissies" or, more explicitly, "faggots."
The
‘Faggot’ Factor:
The
chickens came home to roost at Columbine High.
Murders associated with Anti-gay harassment? Re: Charles Andrew Williams and schooting shotting at San Diego's Santana High School. "'They were teasing him, calling him 'country boy.' He didn't dress right; he didn't look right. He was skinny. They called him gay,' she said. ...Referring to a study of U.S. middle and high school students commissioned by the American Association of University Women (AAUW), a GLSEN report concluded, 'For boys, no other type of harassment provoked as strong a reaction on average; boys in this study would be less upset about physical abuse than they would be if someone called them gay.'" (By Dozetos) - "The gunmen in at least five of the major school shootings -- those from Moses Lake, WA; Pearl, MS; West Paducah, KY; Littleton, CO and now Santee, CA -- were reported to have been targets of anti-gay harassment... While we do not know whether anti-gay teasing was a motivating factor here, studies do show that among boys no other type of harassment, including actual physical abuse, provokes as strong a reaction as being called 'gay' at school. The alienating and well-documented effects of anti-gay harassment take a toll -- regardless of the target's sexual orientation." (GLSEN Executive Director Kevin Jennings.) (Reference: Goldstein, Richard (1999). The 'Faggot' Factor. Orange County Weekly, May 21-27.)
School
Shooter Taunted as "Gay" by Barbara Dozetos, Gay.com / PlanetOut
Network, March 7, 2001.
GLSEN
Statement on Reports of Anti-gay Harassment at Santana H.S. March
8, 2002.
Gay Youth
Against Discrimination - GYAD
- is attempting to end
anti-gay
harassment, at least in some American schools.)
Table
1 - 1999 Oregon YRBS Result Summary For Males & Females
(Grades 9 to 12): Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation
of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.
Table
2 - 1999 Oregon YRBS Result Summary For Males (Grades 9 to 12):
Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations
with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.
Table
3 - 1999 Oregon YRBS Result Summary For Females (Grades 9 to
12): Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals:
Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.
A
Section on Homosexuality-Related Bullying Prepared for a New
Web Page on GLB Suicide Problems in England, Scotland, and Ireland, with
references illustrating that similar abuse is also rampant in Australia.
Note
- Statistical Results were generated using SPSS-10 and the
2X2 table available at - http://home.clara.net/sisa/twoby2.htm
- on the basis of the data set received from Oregon. Unweighted data was
used, but results vary little from what they would be if weighted data
was used. Some of the data used is available at - http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbs/hs99/99q012.htm
(High School Data). The Index Page for 1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior
Survey results: - http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbs/hs99/yrbs99.htm
and the results are accessed via the title "Harassment at School." All
YRBS data may be accessed via Index Page: - http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbsdata.htm
and, on this page, the PDF version of the Oregon health Division Newsletter
reporting the 1999 YRBS data / results for Grade 9 to 12 may be accessed.
The URL is: - http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/newsltr/trends57.pdf
.
The depression / suicidality results for the Middle School 1999 YRBS data set has not been made publicly available. Homophobia tends to be more severe in Middle Schools and the negative results of being subjected to anti-gay harassment maybe be worse than the ones calculate herein for high school students.
Commentary
- Had the authorities in Oregon included "sexual orientation"
questions, as originally intended to produce the 1999 Oregon YRBS data
set, the study data would have been the most complete in terms of
revealing to what degree "The Homosexuality Factor" is associated with
suicide problems for male adolescents in American public schools. As is,
however, the only fact known is that about 31% of male suicide attempters,
35% of multiple attempters, and and 33% of male suicide attempters who
received treatment as the result of their attempt, were in the group of
males reporting being harassed (8.2% of males) because they were assumed
to be homosexual or bisexual (Table 1). Their odds
of attempting suicide are 5-times greater than they are for males not harassed
for this reason. Had "sexual Orientation" information been solicited, the
representation of "The Homosexuality Factor" in male adolescent suicide
problems in Oregon would be known to be much higher than 30 to 35 percent
reported in 2 suicide attempt categories. It is likely that "The Homosexuality
Factor" is implicated in more than 50% of the most serious adolescent male
suicide problems for reasons rendered in a
new paper: The Social Construction of Male Homosexuality
and Related Suicide problems: Research Proposals for the Twenty First Century.
The paper explains why the higher risk for adolescent male suicide problems
reported on this web page could also be called "the sissy factor in
male youth suicide problems."
Female Adolescents: In this study, female adolescents targeted for anti-homosexual harassment have likelihoods for suicide behaviors, compared to other females, not as high as the difference in likelihoods for suicide behaviors between males targeted for anti-gay harassment and other males. For females, such harassment is associated with about 14 percent of suicide attempts, and 19 to 20 of females who are repeat suicide attempters and attempters for whom the suiicde attempt was assoicated with having received medical attention (Table 1).
|
|
|
Result Summary For Males & Females (Grades 9 to 12) 1: Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors. |
|
|
|
on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide behaviors. |
2.1<2.3<2.6
|
|
|
|
N = 11,237 |
n = 10,316 %N = 91.8% |
921 1 %N = 8.2% |
|
Question #29 3 (Percent) |
(11.3%) |
(10%) |
(27.8%) |
|
Considering Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
2.5<2.8<3.2 |
||
|
ones in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,348 |
n = 9,490 %N = 91.7% |
858 1 %N = 8.3% |
|
Question #30 4 (Percent) |
(3.5%) |
(2.6%) |
(13.4%) |
|
For Attempting Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
4.1<5.1<6.2 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,348 |
n = 9,490 %N = 91.7% |
858 1 %N = 8.3% |
|
Than Once. Question #30 4 (Percent) |
(1.5%) |
(1.04%) |
(6.2%) |
|
For Attempting Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
4.3<5.9<8.2 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,348 |
n = 9,490 %N = 91.7% |
858 1 %N = 8.3% |
|
Results in Medical Care: Question #315 (Percent) |
(0.10%) |
(0.70%) |
(3.8%) |
|
Attempting Suicide Requiring Treatment Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
3.7<5.5<8.3 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
Question 28: "During the past 12 months, did you ever feel so sad or hopeless almost every day for two weeks or more?"
Question 29: "During the past 12 months, did you ever seriously consider attempting suicide?"
Question 30: "During the past 12 months, how many times did you actually attempt suicide?"
Question 31: "If you attempted suicide during the past 12 months, did any attempt result in an injury, poisoning, or overdose that had to be treated by a doctor or nurse?"
The Oregon 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Questions are available at http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbs/hs99/yrbsques.htm (High School) and http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbs/ms99/yrbsques.htm (Middle School).
|
|
|
on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide behaviors. |
1.8<1.9<2.1
|
|
|
|
N = 11,544 |
n = 10,886 %N = 94.2% |
6581 %N = 5.8% |
|
Question #29 3 (Percent) |
(21.2%) |
(19.9%) |
(43.8%) |
|
Considering Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
2.0<2.2<2.4 |
||
|
ones in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,939 |
n = 10,309 %N = 94.2% |
630 1 %N = 5.8% |
|
Question #30 4 (Percent) |
(9.4%) |
(8.5%) |
(23.3%) |
|
Attempting Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
2.3<2.7<3.2 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,939 |
n = 10,309 %N = 94.3% |
630 1 %N = 5.7% |
|
Than Once. Question #30 4 (Percent) |
(4.2%) |
(3.6%) |
(13.5%) |
|
Attempting Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
3.0<3.7<4.7 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,939 |
n = 10,309 %N = 94.3% |
630 1 %N = 5.7% |
|
Results in Medical Care: Question #31 5 (Percent) |
(2.4%) |
(2.0%) |
(8.2%) |
|
Attempting Suicide Requiring Treatment Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
3.0<4.1<5.4 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suicide Attempters / Non-attempters Attempters = %F |
Suicide Attempters / Non-attempters Attempters = %F |
Risk Ratio Harassed vs. Non- Harassed 95% CI |
Chi Square: One Degree of Freedom. |
|
in One to Three Categories 1 C vs. W 5
|
199/2136 = 9.3% W: 139 / 1433 129/1562 = 8.3% C: 60 / 504 60/564 = 10.6% ----- |
162/8099 = 2.0% 131 / 6827 131/6958 = 1.8% 31 / 1110 31/1141 = 2.7% ----- |
2.7<4.7<5.7 4.0<5.1<6.5 3.7<4.7<5.9 2.7<4.3<6.7 2.6<3.9<5.4 0.89<1.2<1.7 |
p = .0000 X2 = 203, p = .0000 X2 = 29.1, p = .0000 X2 = 1.6, p = .12 |
|
One of Three Categories C vs. W
|
102/1500 = 6.8% W: 67 / 1054 67/1121 = 6.0% C: 35 / 344 35/379 = 9.2% ----- |
162/8099 = 2.0% 131 / 6827 131/6958 = 1.8% 31 / 1110 31/1141 = 2.7% ----- |
2.8<3.4<4.3 2.4<3.2<4.2 2.4<3.2<4.5 2.2<3.6<6.0 2.1<3.4<5.4 1.0<1.6<2.4 |
p = .0000 X2 = 67.7, p = .0000 X2 = 29.1, p = .0000 X2 = 4.7, p = .03 |
|
Two of Three Categories C vs. W
|
67/468 = 14.3% W: 48 / 280 48/328 = 14.6% C: 19 / 121 19/140 = 13.6% ----- |
162/8099 = 2.0% 131 / 6827 131/6958 = 1.8% 31 / 1110 31/1141 = 2.7% ----- |
5.5<7.2<9.4 6.3<8.9<12.7 5.7<7.8<10.6 3.1<5.6<10.2 4 2.9<5.0<8.6 0.51<0.92<1.6 |
p = .0000 X2 = 212, p = .0000 X2 = 39.2, p = .0000 X2 = 0.09, p = .76 |
|
Three Categories C / W
|
30/168 = 17.9% W: 24 / 99 24/123 = 19.5% C: 6 / 39 6/45 = 13.3% ----- |
162/8099 = 2.0% 131 / 6827 131/6958 = 1.8% 31 / 1110 31/1141 = 2.7% ----- |
6.2<8.9<12.8 7.9<12.6<20.4 7.4<24.3<15.7 2.2<5.5<14.0 2.1<4.9<11.2 0.24<0.63<1.7 |
p = .0000 X2 = 175, p = .0000 X2 = 16.1, p = .0000 X2 = 0.86, p = .35 |
|
|
|
Suicide Attempters / Non-attempters Attempters = %F |
Suicide Attempters / Non-attempters Attempters = %F |
Risk Ratio Harassed vs. Non- Harassed 95% CI |
Chi Square: One Degree of Freedom. |
|
One to Three Categories 1 C vs. W 5
|
87/2136 = 4.1% W: 65 / 1507 65/1567 = 4.1% C: 22 / 542 22/564 = 3.9% ----- |
63/8099 = 0.78% 53 / 6905 53/6958 = 0.77% 10 / 1131 10/1141 = 0.88% ----- |
3.8<5.2<7.2 3.9<5.6<8.1 3.8<4.4<9.3 2.2<4.6<9.8 2.1<4.4<9.3 0.59<0.94<1.5 |
p = .0000 X2 = 203, p = .0000 X2 = 18.7, p = .0000 X2 = 0.04, p = .80 |
|
One of Three Categories C vs. W
|
37/1500 = 2.5% W: 26 / 1095 26/1121 = 2.3% C: 11 / 368 11/379 = 2.9% ----- |
63/8099 = 0.78% 53 / 6905 53/6958 = 0.77% 10 / 1131 10/1141 = 0.88% ----- |
2.1<3.2<4.7 1.9<3.1<5.0 1.9<3.0<4.8 1.4<3.4<8.0 1.4<3.3<7.7 0.62<1.3<2.6 |
p = .0000 X2 = 24.2, p = .0000 X2 = 8.6, p = .003 X2 = 0.4, p = .53 |
|
Two of Three Categories C vs. W
|
34/468 = 7.8% W: 25 / 303 25/328 = 8.2% C: 9 / 131 9/140 = 6.4% ----- |
63/8099 = 0.78% 53 / 6905 53/6958 = 0.77% 10 / 1131 10/1141 = 0.88% ----- |
6.3<9.4<14.0 6.6<10.7<17.5 6.3<10.0<15.9 3.1<7.7<19.5 4 3.0<7.3<17.7 0.45<0.79<1.4 |
p = .0000 X2 = 65.6, p = .0000 X2 = 26.3, p = .0000 X2 = 0.21, p = .65 |
|
Three Categories C vs. W
|
16/168 = 9.5% W: 14 / 109 14/123 = 11.4% C: 2 / 43 2/45 = 13.3% ----- |
63/8099 = 0.78% 53 / 6905 53/6958 = 0.77% 10 / 1131 10/1141 = 0.88% ----- |
7.2<12.2<20.7 9.0<14.9<26.2 8.5<24.3<15.7 1.1<5.3<24.7 1.1<5.1<22.5 0.08<0.39<1.8 |
p = .0000 X2 = 48.1, p = .0000 X2 = 16.1, p = .0000 X2 = 1.7, p = .21 |
|
|
|
Med. Attempters / Non-M. Attempters M. Attempters = %F |
Med. Attempters/ Non-M. Attempters M. Attempters = %F |
Risk Ratio Harassed vs. Non- Harassed 95% CI |
Chi Square: One Degree of Freedom. |
|
One to Three Categories 1 C vs. W 5
|
51/2121 = 2.4% W: 43 / 1515 43/1558 = 2.8% C: 8 / 555 8/563 = 1.4% ----- |
47/8037 = 0.58% 39 / 6962 39/7001 = 0.56% 8 / 1128 8/1136 = 0.70 ----- |
2.8<4.1<6.1 3.2<5.0<7.7 3.2<4.9<7.5 0.76<2.0<5.4 0.76<2.0<5.3 1.0<3.8<13.9 |
p = .0000 X2 = 63.8, p = .0000 X2 = 2.1, p = .15 X2 = 3.2, p = .07 |
|
One of Three Categories C vs. W
|
19/1487 = 1.3% W: 16 / 1093 16/1109 = 1.4% C: 3 / 137 3/140 = 2.1% ----- |
47/8037 = 0.58% 39 / 6962 39/7001 = 0.56% 8 / 1128 8/1136 = 0.70 ----- |
1.3<2.2<2.7 1.4<2.5<4.6 1.4<2.5<4.5 0.30<1.1<4.3 0.30<1.1<4.2 0.43<1.5<5.2 |
p = .003 X2 = 10.8, p = .0000 X2 = .03, p = .86 X2 = .41, p = .52 |
|
Two of Three Categories C vs. W
|
22/467 = 4.7% W: 19 / 308 19/327 = 5.8% C: 3 / 137 3/140 = 2.1% ----- |
47/8037 = 0.58% 39 / 6962 39/7001 = 0.56% 8 / 1128 8/1136 = 0.70 ----- |
4.9<8.1<3.2 6.2<10.8<19.0 6.0<10.3<17.6 0.81<3.1<11.8 0.82<3.0<11.3 0.10<.35<1.2 |
p = .0000 X2 = 877, p = .0000 X2 = 3.0, p = .08 X2 = 2.9, p = .09 |
|
Three Categories C vs. W
|
10/167 = 6.0% W: 8 / 114 8/122 = 6.6% C: 2 / 43 2/45 = 4.4% ----- |
47/8037 = 0.58% 39 / 6962 39/7001 = 0.56% 8 / 1128 8/1136 = 0.70 ----- |
5.3<10.2<19.9 5.6<12.3<27.0 5.5<11.6<24.3 1.3<6.6<31.8 1.4<6.3<28.9 0.13<0.66<3.2 |
p = .00000 X2 = 64.7, p = .0000 X2 = 7.2, p = .007 X2 = 0.26, p = 0.61 |
1. Questions Identifying
Three Forms of Harassment:
Question 11: During the past
12 months, have you ever been harassed at school (or on the way to or from
school) because of your race or ethnic origin?
Question 12: During the past
12 months, have you ever been harassed at school (or on the way to and
from school) because someone thought your were gay, lesbian or bisexual?"
Count given, not weighted. The weighted percentage is 7.9% for males harassed,
as opposed to the "8.2%" raw percentage used, meaning that the generated
statistical results are reasonably good approximations of what the results
would be had the calculations been done using the data set.
Question 13: "During the
past 12 months, have you received unwanted sexual comments or attention
at school (or on your way to or from school?)"
2.
Race / Ethnicity: For
the calculation related to "race / ethnicity," results were generated by
using the results for "white" males and male "of color." This latter group
does not include the males (n = 152) who did not answer the question on
race /ethnicity (Question 4), forming about ??? of the sample. Six
of these males had attempted suicide and were not included in suicidality
analyses based on race / ethnicity, such as the analysis of males who responded
with a "yes" or a No" to the three harassment questions: Questions
11- 13. Male "of color" answered affirmatively to any of the following
in Question 4: "How do you describe yourself? (Select one or more
responses.) Am Indian / Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American,
Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian/other, Multiple - Hispanic, Multiple
- Non-hispanic." White males answered affirmatively to the "White" option
only. "A" = All Males, "W" = White Males, and "C" = Males Of Color.
3. Statistics:
The Odd Ratios are calculated at a "95% Confidence Interval" from a two-by-two
table which, in this case (Table 4a), consists of 199 suicide attempters
/ 1937 non-attempters in "harassed male" category and 162 suicide attempters
/ 7937 non-attempters in the "non-harassed" male category, producing an
OR of 4.1<5.0<6.2. The Pearson's Chi Square value (X2)
in this case indicates that the difference between the two paired values
would be due to a chance event less than one time in 10,000: p = .0000.
The Risk Ratio, also calculated at a "95% Confidence Internval," is the
relationship between the suicide attempt incidence in the two categories.
In Table 4b, the Odd Ratios and Risk Ratios are calculated on the basis
of the multiple suicide attempters. In Table 4c, the calculations are based
on the suicide attempters reporting having received medical attention related
to their suicide attempt(s).
4. C vs. W: Comparing
the Odds of attempting suicide for males of color and white males in the
specified category to detemine if the difference would be statistically
significant: p is less than or qual to .05.
|
|
One's Race or Ethnicity |
Orientation is Assumed |
Sexually-Related |
| "White" & "Of Color" Males: Comparing Suicide Attempter(s) for all males responding with a "Yes" or "No" in three harassment categories. |
|
Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
|
OR 4 = 2.2<3.6<4.6 X2 = 130, p = .000 9.7% (105/1082) 2.8% (262/9,282) |
4.5<5.7<7.2 X2 = 266, p = .0000 13.4% (115/858) vs. 2.6% (252/9,490) |
3.4<4.2<5.3 X2 = 175, p = .0000 10.7% (114/1069) vs 2.7% (253/9,242) |
|
2.9<4.1<5.8 X2 = 73.3, p = .0008 4.4% (48/1082) 1.1% (104/9,282) |
4.4<6.2<8.8 X2 = 86.6, p = .0000 %F = 6.2% (53/858) vs. 1.0% (99/9,490) |
3.9<5.5<7.7 X2 = 124, p = .0000 %F = 5.3% (57/1069) 1.0% (94/9,242) |
|
2.1<3.3<5.1 X2 = 30.4, p = .0000 2.5% (27/1072) vs. 0.79% (72/9,210) |
3.7<5.7<8.7 X2 = 82.3, p = .0000 3.9% (33/852) vs. 0.70% (66/9,415) |
3.1<4.6<7.1 X2 = 62.1, p = .0000 3.2% (34/1058) vs. 0.71% (65/9,172) |
|
|
Odd Ratios (95% CI) 6 Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
Orientation is Assumed Odd Ratios (95% CI) 6 Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
Sexually-Related Odd Ratios (95% CI) 6 Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0<4.0<5.4
|
1.6<2.4<3.7
|