Comments
pierre@youth-suicide.com
Gay / Bisexual Male Youth Suicide Problems
The 1999 Oregon YRBS Results
Home
Web-Link GLBT Education
To: Gay Page Award. Want one?
Summary of Results for the 
1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey
Serious Problems For Adolescents 
Subjected to Anti-Homosexual Harassment
MHN Badge

Growing Up Normal in a Perfect World

I was first exposed to the hatred felt by many against gay individuals while growing up in a very small city, in southern Ontario. I was 13, and in grade eight at the time, and a new kid in school was labeled a "faggot" by the "in crowd" for no apparent reason. This was my first introduction to both the definition of the word, and to the fear that I slowly developed for anyone whom I suspected of being gay.

"Boys Will Be Boys": How "masculinity" in American culture
affects safety in our schools.

Adolescent suicide related to anti-gay harassment? Yes, but if the boy who killed himself was also having problems with being homosexually oriented - which is not known - his parents highly negative attitudes with respect to possibly having had a "gay" son may have factored into the boy's death:

Teen’s Suicide Prompts Anger (May, 2000)

Murders associated with Anti-gay harassment? Boys who don't conform to a set standard of masculine behavior and appearance -- who don't play contact sports, for example, or who are short or slight -- risk being ostracized as "sissies" or, more explicitly, "faggots."

The ‘Faggot’ Factor:
The chickens came home to roost at Columbine High.

Murders associated with Anti-gay harassment? Re: Charles Andrew Williams and schooting shotting at San Diego's Santana High School. "'They were teasing him, calling him 'country boy.' He didn't dress right; he didn't look right. He was skinny. They called him gay,' she said. ...Referring to a study of U.S. middle and high school students commissioned by the American Association of University Women (AAUW), a GLSEN report concluded, 'For boys, no other type of harassment provoked as strong a reaction on average; boys in this study would be less upset about physical abuse than they would be if someone called them gay.'" (By Dozetos) - "The gunmen in at least five of the major school shootings -- those from Moses Lake, WA; Pearl, MS; West Paducah, KY; Littleton, CO and now Santee, CA -- were reported to have been targets of anti-gay harassment... While we do not know whether anti-gay teasing was a motivating factor here, studies do show that among boys no other type of harassment, including actual physical abuse, provokes as strong a reaction as being called 'gay' at school. The alienating and well-documented effects of anti-gay harassment take a toll -- regardless of the target's sexual orientation." (GLSEN Executive Director Kevin Jennings.) (Reference: Goldstein, Richard (1999). The 'Faggot' Factor. Orange County Weekly, May 21-27.)

School Shooter Taunted as "Gay" by Barbara Dozetos, Gay.com / PlanetOut Network, March 7, 2001.
GLSEN Statement on Reports of Anti-gay Harassment at Santana H.S. March 8, 2002.

Gay Youth Against Discrimination - GYAD - is attempting to end
anti-gay harassment, at least in some American schools.)

Contents

Social Construction of Male Homosexuality and Related Suicide Problems...Social Construction of Male Homosexuality and Related Suicide Problems...Part 1: The Statistical Association Between Suicide-Related Behaviors For Male and Female Adolescents In the Oregon 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

Social Construction of Male Homosexuality and Related Suicide Problems...Table 1 - 1999 Oregon YRBS Result Summary For Males & Females (Grades 9 to 12): Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.

Social Construction of Male Homosexuality and Related Suicide Problems...Table 2 - 1999 Oregon YRBS Result Summary For Males (Grades 9 to 12): Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.

Social Construction of Male Homosexuality and Related Suicide Problems...Table 3 - 1999 Oregon YRBS Result Summary For Females (Grades 9 to 12): Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.

Social Construction of Male Homosexuality and Related Suicide Problems...A Section on Homosexuality-Related Bullying Prepared for a New Web Page on GLB Suicide Problems in England, Scotland, and Ireland, with references illustrating that similar abuse is also rampant in Australia.

Social Construction of Male Homosexuality and Related Suicide Problems...Note - Statistical Results were generated using SPSS-10 and the  2X2 table available at - http://home.clara.net/sisa/twoby2.htm - on the basis of the data set received from Oregon. Unweighted data was used, but results vary little from what they would be if weighted data was used. Some of the data used is available at -  http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbs/hs99/99q012.htm (High School Data).  The Index Page for 1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey results: - http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbs/hs99/yrbs99.htm and the results are accessed via the title "Harassment at School." All YRBS data may be accessed via Index Page: - http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbsdata.htm and, on this page, the PDF version of the Oregon health Division Newsletter reporting the 1999 YRBS data / results for Grade 9 to 12 may be accessed. The URL is: - http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/newsltr/trends57.pdf .

The depression / suicidality results for the Middle School 1999 YRBS data set has not been made publicly available. Homophobia tends to be more severe in Middle Schools and the negative results of being subjected to anti-gay harassment maybe be worse than the ones calculate herein for high school students.

Social Construction of Male Homosexuality and Related Suicide Problems...Commentary - Had the authorities in Oregon included "sexual orientation" questions, as originally intended to produce the 1999 Oregon YRBS data set,  the study data would have been the most complete in terms of revealing to what degree "The Homosexuality Factor" is associated with suicide problems for male adolescents in American public schools. As is, however, the only fact known is that about 31% of male suicide attempters, 35% of multiple attempters, and and 33% of male suicide attempters who received treatment as the result of their attempt, were in the group of males reporting being harassed (8.2% of males) because they were assumed to be homosexual or bisexual (Table 1). Their odds of attempting suicide are 5-times greater than they are for males not harassed for this reason. Had "sexual Orientation" information been solicited, the representation of "The Homosexuality Factor" in male adolescent suicide problems in Oregon would be known to be much higher than 30 to 35 percent reported in 2 suicide attempt categories. It is likely that "The Homosexuality Factor" is implicated in more than 50% of the most serious adolescent male suicide problems for reasons rendered in a new paper: The Social Construction of Male Homosexuality and Related Suicide problems: Research Proposals for the Twenty First Century. The paper explains why the higher risk for adolescent male suicide problems reported on this web page could also be called "the sissy factor in male youth suicide problems."

Female Adolescents: In this study, female adolescents targeted for anti-homosexual harassment have likelihoods for suicide behaviors, compared to other females, not as high as the difference in likelihoods for suicide behaviors between males targeted for anti-gay harassment and other males. For females, such harassment is associated with about 14 percent of suicide attempts, and 19 to 20 of females who are repeat suicide attempters and attempters for whom the suiicde attempt was assoicated with having received medical attention (Table 1).

 
Table 1 - Oregon: 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Survey 
Result Summary For Males & Females (Grades 9 to 12) 1: Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.
CATEGORIES
MALES
N = 10,348
FEMALES
N = 10,939
Harassment based on perceived 
homosexual orientation (percent) in
the past 12 months
n = 858
(8.3%)
n = 630
(5.8%)
Greater likelihood for "Depressed" ones 
to  be in "harassed" group. (Percentage of 
category accounted for by "harassed" group.)
2.3 Times
37% vs. 15.8%
(17.2%)
1.9 Times
56% vs. 29%
(9.0%)
Greater likelihood for the ones who 
"Seriously Considered Suicide" to be
in "harassed" group.  (Percentage of 
category accounted for by "harassed" group.)
2.8 Times
28% vs. 10%
(20.2%)
2.2 Times
44% vs. 20%
(11.7%)
Greater likelihood for "Suicide Attempters"
to be in harassed group. (Percentage of 
category accounted for by "harassed" group.)
5.1 Times
13% vs. 2.6%
(31.3%)
2.7 Times
23% vs. 8.5%
(14.3%)
Greater likelihood for "Suicide Attempters"
who receive treatment to be in harassed
group. (Percentage of  category accounted for by 
"harassed" group.)
 5.5 Times
3.8% vs. 0.70%
(33.3%)
 4.1 Times
8.2% vs. 2.0%
(19.9%)
Greater likelihood for "Repeat Suicide 
Attempters" to be in harassed group. 
(Percentage of  category accounted for by 
"harassed" group.)
5.9 Times
6.2% vs. 1.04%
(34.9%)
3.7 Times
13.5% vs. 3.6%
(18.6%)
Depression: Odds Ratio - 95% CI
& Odds Ratio - 99% CI
2.7<3.1<3.6
2.6<3.1<3.7
2.7<3.1<3.7
2.5<3.1<3.9
Consider Suicide: Odds Ratio - 95% CI
& Odds Ratio - 99% CI
3.0<3.5<4.2
2.9<3.5<4.3
2.7<3.1<3.8
2.6<3.1<4.0
Attempted Suicide: Odds Ratio - 95% CI
& Odds Ratio - 99% CI
 4.5<5.7<7.2
4.2<5.7<7.7
 2.5<3.3<4.0
2.7<3.3<4.2
Suicide Attempt  with Treatment: Odds 
Ratio - 95% CI & Odds Ratio - 99% CI
3.7<5.7<8.3
3.3<5.7<10.0
3.2<4.3<6.0
2.9<4.3<6.6
Multiple Suicide Attempts:  Odds 
Ratio - 95% CI & Odds Ratio - 99% CI
4.4<6.2<8.8
4.0<6.2<9.8
3.2<4.2<5.4
3.0<4.2<5.8

1. Summary of Results Given in Tables 2 and 3.
 
Table 2 - 1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey Result Summary For Males (Grades 9 to 12): Harassment Based 
on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide behaviors.
CATEGORIES
All Males
N =
11,244
Non-Harassed
n = 10,321
%N = 91.8%
Harassed
9231
%N = 8.2%
Depression
Question #28 2
(Percent)
1,965/11,244
(17.5%)
1627/10,321
(15.8%)
338/923
(36.6%)
Greater Likelihood
For Depression
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
2.3 Times

2.1<2.3<2.6

Percent of Depressed
ones in Category
 
82.8%
17.2%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
2.7<3.1<3.6
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
2.6<3.1<3.7
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 256, p= 0.0000
CATEGORIES
All Males
N =
11,237
Non-Harassed
n = 10,316
%N = 91.8%
Harassed
921 1
%N = 8.2%
Consider Suicide
Question #29 3
(Percent)
1,267/11,237
(11.3%)
1011/10,316
(10%)
256/921
(27.8%)
Greater Likelihood For 
Considering Suicide 
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
2.8 Times

2.5<2.8<3.2

Percent of Suicidal
ones in Category
 
79.8%
20.2%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
3.0<3.5<4.2
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
2.9<3.5<4.3
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 274, p= 0.0000
CATEGORIES
All Males
N =
10,348
Non-Harassed
n = 9,490
%N = 91.7%
Harassed
858 1
%N = 8.3%
Attempting Suicide
Question #30 4
(Percent)
367/10,348
(3.5%)
252/9,490
(2.6%)
115/858
(13.4%)
Greater Likelihood
For Attempting Suicide
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
5.1 Times

4.1<5.1<6.2

Percent of Attempters
in Category
 
68.7%
31.3%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
4.5<5.7<7.2
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
4.2<5.7<7.7
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 266, p= 0.00000
CATEGORIES
All Males
N =
10,348
Non-Harassed
n = 9,490
%N = 91.7%
Harassed
858 1
%N = 8.3%
Attempting Suicide More
Than Once. Question #30 4
(Percent)
152/10,348
(1.5%)
99/9,490
(1.04%)
53/858
(6.2%)
Greater Likelihood
For Attempting Suicide
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
5.9 Times

4.3<5.9<8.2

Percent of Attempters
in Category
 
65.1%
34.9%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
4.4<6.2<8.8
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
4.0<6.2<9.8
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 143, p= 0.0000
CATEGORIES
All Males
N =
10,348
Non-Harassed
n = 9,490
%N = 91.7%
Harassed
858 1
%N = 8.3%
Suicide Attempt 
Results in Medical 
Care: Question #315
(Percent)
99/10,348
(0.10%)
66/9490
(0.70%)
33/858
(3.8%)
Greater Likelihood For 
Attempting Suicide 
Requiring Treatment
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
5.5 Times

3.7<5.5<8.3

Percent of Attempters
in Category
 
66.7%
33.3%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
3.7<5.7<8.3
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
3.3<5.7<10.0
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 82.4, p = .0000

Question 11: During the past 12 months, have you ever been harassed at school (or on the way to or from school) because of your race or ethnic origin?

Question 12: During the past 12 months, have you ever been harassed at school (or on the way to and from school) because someone thought your were gay, lesbian or bisexual?" Count given, not weighted. The weighted percentage is 7.9% for males harassed, as opposed to the "8.2%" raw percentage used, meaning that the generated statistical results are reasonably good approximations of what the results would be had the calculations been done using the data set.

Question 13: "During the past 12 months, have you received unwanted sexual comments or attention at school (or on your way to or from school?)"

Question 28: "During the past 12 months, did you ever feel so sad or hopeless almost every  day for two weeks or more?"

Question 29: "During the past 12 months, did you ever seriously consider attempting suicide?"

Question 30: "During the past 12 months, how many times did you actually attempt suicide?"

Question 31: "If you attempted suicide during the past 12 months, did any attempt result in an injury, poisoning, or overdose that had to be treated by a doctor or nurse?"

The Oregon 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Questions are available at http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbs/hs99/yrbsques.htm (High School)  and http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/yrbs/ms99/yrbsques.htm (Middle School).

 
Table 3 - 1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey Result Summary For Females (Grades 9 to 12): Harassment Based 
on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide behaviors.
CATEGORIES
All Females
N =
11,551
Non-Harassed
n = 10,892
%N = 94.3%
Harassed
659 1
%N = 5.7%
Depression
Question #28 2
(Percent)
3,515/11,551
(30.4%)
3,149/10,913
(28.9%)
366/659
(55.5%)
Greater Likelihood
For Depression
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
1.9 Times

1.8<1.9<2.1

Percent of Depressed
ones in Category
 
91.0%
9.0%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
2.6<3.1<3.6
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
2.5<3.1<3.8
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 208, p= 0.0000
CATEGORIES
All Females
N =
11,544
Non-Harassed
n = 10,886
%N = 94.2%
Harassed
6581
%N = 5.8%
Consider Suicide
Question #29 3
(Percent)
2454/11,544
(21.2%)
2,166/10,886
(19.9%)
288/658
(43.8%)
Greater Likelihood For
Considering Suicide
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
2.2 Times

2.0<2.2<2.4

Percent of Suicidal
ones in Category
 
88.3%
11.7%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
2.7<3.1<3.7
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
2.5<3.1<3.9
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 211, p= 0.0000
CATEGORIES
All Females
N =
10,939
Non-Harassed
n = 10,309
%N = 94.2%
Harassed
630 1
%N = 5.8%
Attempting Suicide
Question #30 4
(Percent)
1028/10,939
(9.4%)
881/10,309
(8.5%)
147/630
(23.3%)
Greater Likelihood For 
Attempting Suicide
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
2.7 Times

2.3<2.7<3.2

Percent of Attempters
in Category
 
85.7%
14.3%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
2.5<3.3<4.0
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
2.7<3.3<4.2
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 152, p= 0.0000
CATEGORIES
All Females
N =
10,939
Non-Harassed
n = 10,309
%N = 94.3%
Harassed
630 1
%N = 5.7%
Attempting Suicide More
Than Once. Question #30 4
(Percent)
456/10,939
(4.2%)
371/10,309
(3.6%)
85/630
(13.5%)
Greater Likelihood For 
Attempting Suicide
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
3.7 Times

3.0<3.7<4.7

Percent of Attempters
in Category
 
81.4%
18.6%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
3.2<4.2<5.4
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
3.0<4.2<5.8
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 152, p= 0.0000
CATEGORIES
All Females
N =
10,939
Non-Harassed
n = 10,309
%N = 94.3%
Harassed
630 1
%N = 5.7%
Suicide Attempt 
Results in Medical 
Care: Question #31 5
(Percent)
261/10,939
(2.4%)
209/10,100
(2.0%)
52/578
(8.2%)
Greater Likelihood For
Attempting Suicide 
Requiring Treatment
Risk Ratio: 95% 
Confidence Interval
   
4.1 Times

3.0<4.1<5.4

Percent of Attempters
in Category
 
81.1 %
19.9%
Odds Ratio - 95%
Confidence Interval
   
3.2<4.3<6.0
Odds Ratio - 99%
Confidence Interval
   
2.9<4.3<6.6
Pearson's Chi Square (X2) = 98.8, p = .0000

 
Table 4a - 1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results
For Males (Grades 10 to 12): Incidences, Odds Ratios, and
Risk Ratios for Attempting Suicide Associated with 
Harassment in Any of Three Categories, and
in One to Three Categories 1.
Categories
Harassed
Suicide Attempters / 
Non-attempters
Attempters = %F
Non-Harassed
Suicide Attempters / 
Non-attempters
Attempters = %F
Odds Ratio
Risk Ratio
Harassed vs. Non- 
Harassed 95% CI
Pearson's 
Chi Square: 
One Degree
of  Freedom.
Harassment
in One to Three
Categories 1

C vs. W 5
60/504 : 139/1433

A2: 199 / 1937
199/2136 = 9.3%
W: 139 / 1433
129/1562 = 8.3%
C: 60 / 504
60/564 = 10.6%
-----
162 / 7937
162/8099 = 2.0%
131 / 6827
131/6958 = 1.8%
31 / 1110
31/1141 = 2.7%
-----
4.1<5.0<6.23
2.7<4.7<5.7
4.0<5.1<6.5
3.7<4.7<5.9
2.7<4.3<6.7
2.6<3.9<5.4
0.89<1.2<1.7
X2 = 266, 
p = .0000
X2 = 203, 
p = .0000
X2 = 29.1, 
p = .0000
X2 = 1.6, 
p = .12
Harassment in Any
One of Three
Categories

C vs. W
35/344 : 67/1054

A2: 102 / 1397
102/1500 = 6.8%
W: 67 / 1054
67/1121 = 6.0%
C: 35 / 344
35/379 = 9.2%
-----
162 / 7937
162/8099 = 2.0%
131 / 6827
131/6958 = 1.8%
31 / 1110
31/1141 = 2.7%
-----
2.8<3.6<4.63
2.8<3.4<4.3
2.4<3.2<4.2
2.4<3.2<4.5
2.2<3.6<6.0
2.1<3.4<5.4
1.0<1.6<2.4
X2 = 109, 
p = .0000
X2 = 67.7, 
p = .0000
X2 = 29.1, 
p = .0000
X2 = 4.7, 
p = .03
Harassment in Any
Two of Three
Categories

C vs. W
19 / 121 - 48 / 280

A 2: 67/ 401
67/468 = 14.3%
W: 48 / 280
48/328 = 14.6%
C: 19 / 121
19/140 = 13.6%
-----
162 / 7937
162/8099 = 2.0%
131 / 6827
131/6958 = 1.8%
31 / 1110
31/1141 = 2.7%
-----
6.0<8.2<11.13
5.5<7.2<9.4
6.3<8.9<12.7
5.7<7.8<10.6
3.1<5.6<10.2 4
2.9<5.0<8.6
0.51<0.92<1.6
X2 = 258, 
p = .0000
X2 = 212, 
p = .0000
X2 = 39.2, 
p = .0000
X2 = 0.09, 
p = .76
Harassment in
Three
Categories

C / W
6 / 39 - 24 / 99

A 2: 30 / 138
30/168 = 17.9%
W: 24 / 99
24/123 = 19.5%
C: 6 / 39
6/45 = 13.3%
-----
162 / 7937
162/8099 = 2.0%
131 / 6827
131/6958 = 1.8%
31 / 1110
31/1141 = 2.7%
-----
7.0<10.6<16.3
6.2<8.9<12.8
7.9<12.6<20.4
7.4<24.3<15.7
2.2<5.5<14.0
2.1<4.9<11.2
0.24<0.63<1.7
X2= 182, 
p = .0000
X2 = 175, 
p = .0000
X2 = 16.1, 
p = .0000
X2 = 0.86, 
p = .35

 
Table 4b - 1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results
For Males (Grades 10 to 12): Incidences, Odds Ratios, and
Risk Ratios for Multiple Suicide Attempts Associated
with Harassment in Any of Three Categories,
and in One to Three Categories 1.
Categories
Harassed
Suicide Attempters / 
Non-attempters
Attempters = %F
Non-Harassed
Suicide Attempters / 
Non-attempters
Attempters = %F
Odds Ratio
Risk Ratio
Harassed vs. Non- 
Harassed 95% CI
Pearson's 
Chi Square: 
One Degree
of  Freedom.
Harassment in
One to Three
Categories 1

C vs. W 5
22/542 : 65/1507

A2: 87 / 2049
87/2136 = 4.1%
W: 65 / 1507
65/1567 = 4.1%
C: 22 / 542
22/564 = 3.9%
-----
63 / 8036
63/8099 = 0.78%
53 / 6905
53/6958 = 0.77%
10 / 1131
10/1141 = 0.88%
-----
3.9<5.4<7.53
3.8<5.2<7.2
3.9<5.6<8.1
3.8<4.4<9.3
2.2<4.6<9.8
2.1<4.4<9.3
0.59<0.94<1.5
X2 = 127, 
p = .0000
X2 = 203, 
p = .0000
X2 = 18.7, 
p = .0000
X2 = 0.04, 
p = .80
Harassment in Any
One of Three
Categories

C vs. W
11/368 : 26/1095

A2: 37 / 1463
37/1500 = 2.5%
W: 26 / 1095
26/1121 = 2.3%
C: 11 / 368
11/379 = 2.9%
-----
63 / 8036
63/8099 = 0.78%
53 / 6905
53/6958 = 0.77%
10 / 1131
10/1141 = 0.88%
-----
2.1<3.2<4.73
2.1<3.2<4.7
1.9<3.1<5.0
1.9<3.0<4.8
1.4<3.4<8.0
1.4<3.3<7.7
0.62<1.3<2.6
X2 = 35.0, 
p = .0000
X2 = 24.2, 
p = .0000
X2 = 8.6, 
p = .003
X2 = 0.4, 
p = .53
Harassment in Any
Two of Three
Categories

C vs. W
9/131 - 25/303

A 2: 34/ 434
34/468 = 7.8%
W: 25 / 303
25/328 = 8.2%
C: 9 / 131
9/140 = 6.4%
-----
63 / 8036
63/8099 = 0.78%
53 / 6905
53/6958 = 0.77%
10 / 1131
10/1141 = 0.88%
-----
6.5<10.0<15.33
6.3<9.4<14.0
6.6<10.7<17.5
6.3<10.0<15.9
3.1<7.7<19.5 4
3.0<7.3<17.7
0.45<0.79<1.4
X2 = 166, 
p = .0000
X2 = 65.6, 
p = .0000
X2 = 26.3, 
p = .0000
X2 = 0.21, 
p = .65
Harassment in
Three
Categories

C vs. W
2/45 - 14/123

A 2: 16 / 152
16/168 = 9.5%
W: 14 / 109
14/123 = 11.4%
C: 2 / 43
2/45 = 13.3%
-----
63 / 8036
63/8099 = 0.78%
53 / 6905
53/6958 = 0.77%
10 / 1131
10/1141 = 0.88%
-----
7.6<13.4<23.8
7.2<12.2<20.7
9.0<14.9<26.2
8.5<24.3<15.7
1.1<5.3<24.7
1.1<5.1<22.5
0.08<0.39<1.8
X2= 48.9, 
p = .0000
X2 = 48.1, 
p = .0000
X2 = 16.1, 
p = .0000
X2 = 1.7, 
p = .21
Table 4c - 1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results For Males (Grades 10 to 12): Incidences, Odds Ratios, and Risk 
Ratios for Suicide Attempts with Medical Care Associated 
with Harassment in Three Categories, and
in One to Three Categories 1.
Categories
   Harassed 
Med. Attempters /
Non-M. Attempters
M. Attempters = %F
Non-Harassed
Med. Attempters/ 
Non-M. Attempters
M. Attempters = %F
Odds Ratio
Risk Ratio
Harassed vs. Non- 
Harassed 95% CI
Pearson's 
Chi Square: 
One Degree
of  Freedom.
Harassment in
One to Three
Categories 1

C vs. W 5
8/555 - 43/1515

A 2: 51 / 2070
51/2121 = 2.4%
W: 43 / 1515
43/1558 = 2.8%
C: 8 / 555
8/563 = 1.4%
-----
47 / 7990
47/8037 = 0.58%
39 / 6962
39/7001 = 0.56%
8 / 1128
8/1136 = 0.70
-----
2.8<4.1<6.13
2.8<4.1<6.1
3.2<5.0<7.7
3.2<4.9<7.5
0.76<2.0<5.4
0.76<2.0<5.3
1.0<3.8<13.9
X2 = 58.2, 
p = .0000
X2 = 63.8, 
p = .0000
X2 = 2.1, 
p = .15
X2 = 3.2, 
p = .07
Harassment in Any
One of Three
Categories

C vs. W
3/137 - 16/1093

A 2: 19 / 1468
19/1487 = 1.3%
W: 16 / 1093
16/1109 = 1.4%
C: 3 / 137
3/140 = 2.1%
-----
47 / 7990
47/8037 = 0.58%
39 / 6962
39/7001 = 0.56%
8 / 1128
8/1136 = 0.70
-----
1.3<2.2<3.8
1.3<2.2<2.7
1.4<2.5<4.6
1.4<2.5<4.5
0.30<1.1<4.3
0.30<1.1<4.2
0.43<1.5<5.2
X2 = 8.7, 
p = .003
X2 = 10.8, 
p = .0000
X2 = .03, 
p = .86
X2 = .41,
p = .52
Harassment in Any
Two of Three
Categories

C vs. W
3/137 - 19/308

A 2: 22 / 445
22/467 = 4.7%
W: 19 / 308
19/327 = 5.8%
C: 3 / 137
3/140 = 2.1%
-----
47 / 7990
47/8037 = 0.58%
39 / 6962
39/7001 = 0.56%
8 / 1128
8/1136 = 0.70
-----
5.0<8.4<14.1
4.9<8.1<3.2
6.2<10.8<19.0
6.0<10.3<17.6
0.81<3.1<11.8
0.82<3.0<11.3
0.10<.35<1.2
X2 = 273, 
p = .0000
X2 = 877, 
p = .0000
X2 = 3.0, 
p = .08
X2 = 2.9, 
p = .09
Harassment in
Three
Categories

C vs. W
2/43 - 8/114

A 2: 10 / 157
10/167 = 6.0%
W: 8 / 114
8/122 = 6.6%
C: 2 / 43
2/45 = 4.4%
-----
47 / 7990
47/8037 = 0.58%
39 / 6962
39/7001 = 0.56%
8 / 1128
8/1136 = 0.70
-----
5.4<10.8<21.8
5.3<10.2<19.9
5.6<12.3<27.0
5.5<11.6<24.3
1.3<6.6<31.8
1.4<6.3<28.9
0.13<0.66<3.2
X2 = 69.2, 
p = .00000
X2 = 64.7, 
p = .0000
X2 = 7.2, 
p = .007
X2 = 0.26, 
p = 0.61


1. Questions Identifying Three Forms of Harassment:


Question 11: During the past 12 months, have you ever been harassed at school (or on the way to or from school) because of your race or ethnic origin?

Question 12: During the past 12 months, have you ever been harassed at school (or on the way to and from school) because someone thought your were gay, lesbian or bisexual?" Count given, not weighted. The weighted percentage is 7.9% for males harassed, as opposed to the "8.2%" raw percentage used, meaning that the generated statistical results are reasonably good approximations of what the results would be had the calculations been done using the data set.

Question 13: "During the past 12 months, have you received unwanted sexual comments or attention at school (or on your way to or from school?)"

2. Race / Ethnicity: For the calculation related to "race / ethnicity," results were generated by using the results for "white" males and male "of color." This latter group does not include the males (n = 152) who did not answer the question on race /ethnicity (Question 4), forming about ??? of the sample. Six of these males had attempted suicide and were not included in suicidality analyses based on race / ethnicity, such as the analysis of males who responded with a "yes" or a No" to the three harassment questions: Questions 11- 13. Male "of color" answered affirmatively to any of the following in Question 4: "How do you describe yourself? (Select one or more responses.) Am Indian / Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian/other, Multiple - Hispanic, Multiple - Non-hispanic." White males answered affirmatively to the "White" option only. "A" = All Males, "W" = White Males, and "C" = Males Of Color.

3. Statistics: The Odd Ratios are calculated at a "95% Confidence Interval" from a two-by-two table which, in this case (Table 4a), consists of 199 suicide attempters / 1937 non-attempters in "harassed male" category and 162 suicide attempters / 7937 non-attempters in the "non-harassed" male category, producing an OR of 4.1<5.0<6.2. The Pearson's Chi Square value (X2) in this case indicates that the difference between the two paired values would be due to a chance event less than one time in 10,000: p = .0000. The Risk Ratio, also calculated at a "95% Confidence Internval," is the relationship between the suicide attempt incidence in the two categories. In Table 4b, the Odd Ratios and Risk Ratios are calculated on the basis of the multiple suicide attempters. In Table 4c, the calculations are based on the suicide attempters reporting having received medical attention related to their suicide attempt(s).

4. C vs. W: Comparing the Odds of attempting suicide for males of color and white males in the specified category to detemine if the difference would be statistically significant: p is less than or qual to .05.

Table 5: 1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results For 
Males (Grades 10 to 12): Suicide Attempt Results for 
Adolescent Males Harassed and Not Harassed in 
Three Harassment Categories
1 Harassment: Based on 
One's Race or Ethnicity
2 Harassment: Gay/ Bisexual
Orientation is Assumed
3 Harassment:
Sexually-Related
"White" & "Of Color" Males: Comparing Suicide Attempter(s) for all males responding with a "Yes" or "No" in three harassment categories.
Odds Ratio (OR)
Suicide Attempt Incidences:
Harassed vs. Non-Harassed
Odds Ratio (OR)
Suicide Attempt Incidences:
Harassed vs. Non-Harassed
Odds Ratio (OR)
Suicide Attempt Incidences:
Harassed vs. Non-Harassed
1+ Attempts 4
OR 4 = 2.2<3.6<4.6
X2  = 130,  p = .000
9.7% (105/1082)
2.8% (262/9,282)
1+ Attempts 4
4.5<5.7<7.2
X2  = 266,  p = .0000
13.4% (115/858) vs.
2.6% (252/9,490)
1+ Attempts 4
3.4<4.2<5.3
X2  = 175,  p = .0000
10.7% (114/1069) vs
2.7% (253/9,242)
2+ Attempts 4
2.9<4.1<5.8
X2  = 73.3,  p = .0008
4.4% (48/1082)
1.1% (104/9,282)
2+ Attempts 4
4.4<6.2<8.8
X2  = 86.6,  p = .0000
%F = 6.2% (53/858) vs. 
1.0% (99/9,490)
2+ Attempts 4
3.9<5.5<7.7
X2  = 124,  p = .0000
%F = 5.3% (57/1069)
1.0% (94/9,242)
Attempt(s) + Medical Treatment4
2.1<3.3<5.1
X2  = 30.4,  p = .0000
2.5% (27/1072) vs.
0.79% (72/9,210)
Attempt(s) + Medical Treatment4
3.7<5.7<8.7
X2  = 82.3,  p = .0000
3.9% (33/852) vs.
0.70% (66/9,415)
Attempt(s) + Medical Treatment4
3.1<4.6<7.1
X2  = 62.1,  p = .0000
3.2% (34/1058) vs.
0.71% (65/9,172)

 
Table 5a: 1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey Results 
For Males (Grades 10 to 12): Suicide Attempt Results Based 
on Race / Ethnicity for Adolescent Males Harassed and 
Not Harassed in Three Harassment Categories
1 Harassment: Based on One's Race / Ethnicity
Odd Ratios (95% CI) 6
Suicide Attempt Incidences:
Harassed vs. Non-Harassed
2 Harassment: Gay/ Bisexual
Orientation is Assumed
Odd Ratios (95% CI) 6
Suicide Attempt Incidences:
Harassed vs. Non-Harassed
3 Harassment
Sexually-Related
Odd Ratios (95% CI) 6
Suicide Attempt Incidences:
Harassed vs. Non-Harassed

White
Of Color
White
Of Color
White
Of Color
1+ Attempts

3.0<4.0<5.4
X2 = 97.3, 
p = .0000
10.2% (62/635) 
2.8% (208/7888)

1+ Attempts

1.6<2.4<3.7
X2 = 16.8, 
p = .0001
<