|
pierre@youth-suicide.com |
The 1999 Oregon YRBS Results |
Web-Link GLBT Education |
![]() |
1999 Oregon Youth Risk Behavior Survey Serious Life-Threatening Problems For Adolescents Subjected to Anti-Homosexual Harassment |
![]() |
I was first exposed to the hatred felt by many against gay individuals while growing up in a very small city, in southern Ontario. I was 13, and in grade eight at the time, and a new kid in school was labeled a "faggot" by the "in crowd" for no apparent reason. This was my first introduction to both the definition of the word, and to the fear that I slowly developed for anyone whom I suspected of being gay.
"Boys
Will Be Boys": How "masculinity" in American culture
affects
safety in our schools N/A.
Adolescent suicide related to anti-gay harassment? Yes, but if the boy who killed himself was also having problems with being homosexually oriented - which is not known - his parents highly negative attitudes with respect to possibly having had a "gay" son may have factored into the boy's death:
Murders associated with Anti-gay
harassment? Boys who don't conform to a set standard of masculine behavior
and appearance -- who don't play contact sports, for example, or who are
short or slight -- risk being ostracized as "sissies" or, more explicitly,
"faggots."
Silence is the Voice of Complicity: Addressing Homophobia in Schools (1999)
Kevin Jenings
The
‘Faggot’ Factor:
The
chickens came home to roost at Columbine High (1999).
Murders associated with Anti-gay harassment? Re: Charles Andrew Williams and schooting shotting at San Diego's Santana High School. "'They were teasing him, calling him 'country boy.' He didn't dress right; he didn't look right. He was skinny. They called him gay,' she said. ...Referring to a study of U.S. middle and high school students commissioned by the American Association of University Women (AAUW), a GLSEN report concluded, 'For boys, no other type of harassment provoked as strong a reaction on average; boys in this study would be less upset about physical abuse than they would be if someone called them gay.'" (By Dozetos) - "The gunmen in at least five of the major school shootings -- those from Moses Lake, WA; Pearl, MS; West Paducah, KY; Littleton, CO and now Santee, CA -- were reported to have been targets of anti-gay harassment... While we do not know whether anti-gay teasing was a motivating factor here, studies do show that among boys no other type of harassment, including actual physical abuse, provokes as strong a reaction as being called 'gay' at school. The alienating and well-documented effects of anti-gay harassment take a toll -- regardless of the target's sexual orientation." (GLSEN Executive Director Kevin Jennings.) (Reference: Goldstein, Richard (1999). The 'Faggot' Factor. Orange County Weekly, May 21-27.)
School
Shooter Taunted as "Gay" by Barbara Dozetos, Gay.com / PlanetOut
Network, March 7, 2001.
GLSEN
Statement on Reports of Anti-gay Harassment at Santana H.S. March
8, 2001.
Gay Youth
Against Discrimination - GYAD N/A
- is attempting to end
anti-gay
harassment, at least in some American schools.)
GLSENOregon. - GLSEN Hails Defeat of Oregon's Anti-gay No. 9. - Oregon Rejects Anti-Gay Initiative. - Oregon Safe Schools and Communities Coalition (OSSCC). - Oregon Gay Straight Alliance Network. - Central Oregon Gay Striaght Alliance. - Homophobia at West Linn High School (2006): Brandon Flyte, a student at West Linn High School in West Linn, Oregon, was recently expelled for airing a video project he had been assigned in class which includes a same-sex "snuggle" scene. The film, Brokeback High, is a "gay love story" based on themes from Brokeback Mountain, but set in a modern day high school. The shot above was the one that got him expelled. - Rural Gay-Straight Alliances Look to GLSEN Oregon’s Urban Efforts for Support (2009). - Oregon: Senate Approves Bullying Bill, Heads to Governor (2009). - Safety in schools for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth (2009).
New Reports Call Bullying in Oregon Schools a Major Problem
(2009): "One in three gay and transgender students in Oregon indicate
that the hostile climate in their high school created a significant
barrier to graduation," stated Tash Shatz, of the Oregon Students Equal
Rights Alliance."And more than half of gay and transgender college
students concealed their sexual orientation or gender identity for fear
of personal safety, discrimination, or rejection." - Ore. school district to examine policy after gay group silenced:
A southern Oregon school district is reexamining its policies after
LGBT students at South Medford High School say they were denied
permission to put up posters for the National Day of Silence
recognizing the victims of anti-gay bullying. - Lambda slams school officals re: South Medford High School student and Gay Straight Alliance (2009). - Transgender Youth School Guidelines from TransActive Education & Advocacy (2009).
The
GLSEN (Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network: The Studies/Reports) "Safety Report Card"
ratings of major school districts in the United States. GLSEN: 2003 National School Climate Survey (on Gay Harassment). - Release
of 2003 National School Climate Survey Sheds New Light on the Experiences
of LGBT Students in America’s Schools: "At the same time, more
than 4 out of 5 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) students
report being verbally, sexually or physically harassed at school because
of their sexual orientation. “This year’s findings clearly demonstrate
that despite modest measurable gains, violence, bias and harassment of
LGBT students continues to be the rule, not the exception, in America’s
schools,” said GLSEN Executive Director Kevin Jennings. “This research
reveals what must be inherent to so many educators and parents: harassment
has a negative impact on LGBT students’ academic performance and college
ambitions. To ignore these numbers is an irresponsible message to all students
that any promise of equal access to education remains forged and fictitious.”- Grading
Our Schools - homophobia (Last Article). (Related
Information) - GLSEN's
2005 National School Climate Survey Sheds New Light on Experiences of
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) Students: "75.4%
of students heard derogatory remarks such as "faggot" or "dyke"
frequently or often at school, and nearly nine out of ten (89.2%)
reported hearing "that's so gay" or "you're so gay" - meaning stupid or
worthless- frequently or often." - The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual and Transgender Middle School Students: Findings from the 2007
National School Climate Survey. Research Brief. - 2007 National School Climate Survey: Nearly 9 out of 10 LGBT Students Harassed. - From: "Growing
Up Gay: Are Schools Doing Enough to Support Gay Students?": "Eight
U.S. school districts received the highest grade of "A"... More than twenty
of the 42 large U.S. school districts received failing grades." What is
an "A"? "Everything is relative," Cimino told the Herald. "If you're
going to put it on a normal scale of what we should have, we're a D-. But
when we're compared to what's going on in other school districts, we're
an A." - 2009 National School Climate Survey. - GLSEN Article on Demographic and Ecological Factors Contributing to Hostile School Climate for Gay Youth Published. - Silence
is the Voice of Complicity: Addressing Homophobia in Schools (Abstract). - GLSEN's Anti-Bullying Resources. - GLSEN" Safe Space Kit: What you can do to make your school safe for LGBT youth. - GLSEN" Tools to Develop and Implement a Safe Schools Campaign: Launch and sustain effective campaigns. - GLSEN's Jump-Start Guide for Gay-Straight Alliances: Download guides for students and gay-straight alliances/gsa. - Teaching Tolerance: Meet the Teacher Who Started Gay-Straight Alliances (2010). - The 2001 National
School Climate Survey by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network Summary (PDF
Download).
Table
1 - 1999 Oregon YRBS Result Summary For Males & Females
(Grades 9 to 12): Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation
of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.
Table
2 - 1999 Oregon YRBS Result Summary For Males (Grades 9 to 12):
Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations
with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.
Table
3 - 1999 Oregon YRBS Result Summary For Females (Grades 9 to
12): Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals:
Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors.
A
Section on Homosexuality-Related Bullying Prepared for a New
Web Page on GLB Suicide Problems in England, Scotland, and Ireland, with
references illustrating that similar abuse is also rampant in Australia.
Note
- Statistical Results were generated using SPSS-10 and the
2X2 table available at - http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/statistics/twoby2.htm
- on the basis of the data set received from Oregon. Unweighted data was
used, but results vary little from what they would be if weighted data
was used. Some of the data was obtained
from the 1999 Youth Risk Behavior "Summary
Report" (PDF Download available, Archive Link) (High School Data). All YRBS data may be accessed via Index Page: - http://www.dhs.state.or.us/publichealth/chs/yrbsdata.cfm
N/A (Archive Link) and the results are accessed via the title "Harassment at School." On this page, the PDF version of the Oregon health Division Newsletter
reporting the 1999 YRBS data / results for Grade 9 to 12 may be accessed.
The URL is: - http://www.ohd.hr.state.or.us/chs/newsltr/trends57.pdf
N/A Archive Link. Youth Risk Behavior Questions (PDF
Download N/A Archive Link).
The depression / suicidality results for the Middle School 1999 YRBS data set has not been made publicly available. Homophobia tends to be more severe in Middle Schools and the negative results of being subjected to anti-gay harassment may be worse than the ones calculated herein for high school students.
Commentary
- Had the authorities in Oregon included "sexual orientation"
questions, as originally intended to produce the 1999 Oregon YRBS data
set, the study data would have been the most complete in terms of
revealing to what degree "The Homosexuality Factor" is associated with
suicide problems for male adolescents in American public schools. As is,
however, the only fact known is that about 31% of male suicide attempters,
35% of multiple attempters, and and 33% of male suicide attempters who
received treatment as the result of their attempt, were in the group of
males reporting being harassed (8.2% of males) because they were assumed
to be homosexual or bisexual (Table 1). Their odds
of attempting suicide are 5-times greater than they are for males not harassed
for this reason. Had "sexual Orientation" information been solicited, the
representation of "The Homosexuality Factor" in male adolescent suicide
problems in Oregon would be known to be much higher than 30 to 35 percent
reported in 2 suicide attempt categories. It is likely that "The Homosexuality
Factor" is implicated in more than 50% of the most serious adolescent male
suicide problems for reasons rendered in a
new paper: The Social Construction of Male Homosexuality
and Related Suicide problems: Research Proposals for the Twenty First Century.
The paper explains why the higher risk for adolescent male suicide problems
reported on this web page could also be called "the sissy factor in
male youth suicide problems."
Female Adolescents: In this study, female adolescents targeted for anti-homosexual harassment have likelihoods for suicide behaviors, compared to other females, not as high as the difference in likelihoods for suicide behaviors between males targeted for anti-gay harassment and other males. For females, such harassment is associated with about 14 percent of suicide attempts, and 19 to 20 of females who are repeat suicide attempters and attempters for whom the suiicde attempt was assoicated with having received medical attention (Table 1).
|
|
|
Result Summary For Males & Females (Grades 9 to 12) 1: Harassment Based on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide Behaviors. |
|
|
|
on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide behaviors. |
2.1<2.3<2.6
|
|
|
|
N = 11,237 |
n = 10,316 %N = 91.8% |
921 1 %N = 8.2% |
|
Question #29 3 (Percent) |
(11.3%) |
(10%) |
(27.8%) |
|
Considering Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
2.5<2.8<3.2 |
||
|
ones in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,348 |
n = 9,490 %N = 91.7% |
858 1 %N = 8.3% |
|
Question #30 4 (Percent) |
(3.5%) |
(2.6%) |
(13.4%) |
|
For Attempting Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
4.1<5.1<6.2 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,348 |
n = 9,490 %N = 91.7% |
858 1 %N = 8.3% |
|
Than Once. Question #30 4 (Percent) |
(1.5%) |
(1.04%) |
(6.2%) |
|
For Attempting Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
4.3<5.9<8.2 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,348 |
n = 9,490 %N = 91.7% |
858 1 %N = 8.3% |
|
Results in Medical Care: Question #315 (Percent) |
(0.10%) |
(0.70%) |
(3.8%) |
|
Attempting Suicide Requiring Treatment Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
3.7<5.5<8.3 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
Question 28: "During the past 12 months, did you ever feel so sad or hopeless almost every day for two weeks or more?"
Question 29: "During the past 12 months, did you ever seriously consider attempting suicide?"
Question 30: "During the past 12 months, how many times did you actually attempt suicide?"
Question 31: "If you attempted suicide during the past 12 months, did any attempt result in an injury, poisoning, or overdose that had to be treated by a doctor or nurse?"
The Oregon 1999 Youth Risk Behavior Questions are available at - (PDF Download N/A Archive Link).
|
|
|
on Perceived Homosexual Orientation of Individuals: Associations with Depression & Suicide behaviors. |
1.8<1.9<2.1
|
|
|
|
N = 11,544 |
n = 10,886 %N = 94.2% |
6581 %N = 5.8% |
|
Question #29 3 (Percent) |
(21.2%) |
(19.9%) |
(43.8%) |
|
Considering Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
2.0<2.2<2.4 |
||
|
ones in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,939 |
n = 10,309 %N = 94.2% |
630 1 %N = 5.8% |
|
Question #30 4 (Percent) |
(9.4%) |
(8.5%) |
(23.3%) |
|
Attempting Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
2.3<2.7<3.2 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,939 |
n = 10,309 %N = 94.3% |
630 1 %N = 5.7% |
|
Than Once. Question #30 4 (Percent) |
(4.2%) |
(3.6%) |
(13.5%) |
|
Attempting Suicide Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
3.0<3.7<4.7 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
N = 10,939 |
n = 10,309 %N = 94.3% |
630 1 %N = 5.7% |
|
Results in Medical Care: Question #31 5 (Percent) |
(2.4%) |
(2.0%) |
(8.2%) |
|
Attempting Suicide Requiring Treatment Risk Ratio: 95% Confidence Interval |
3.0<4.1<5.4 |
||
|
in Category |
|
|
|
|
Confidence Interval |
|
||
|
Confidence Interval |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suicide Attempters / Non-attempters Attempters = %F |
Suicide Attempters / Non-attempters Attempters = %F |
Risk Ratio Harassed vs. Non- Harassed 95% CI |
Chi Square: One Degree of Freedom. |
|
in One to Three Categories 1 C vs. W 5
|
199/2136 = 9.3% W: 139 / 1433 129/1562 = 8.3% C: 60 / 504 60/564 = 10.6% ----- |
162/8099 = 2.0% 131 / 6827 131/6958 = 1.8% 31 / 1110 31/1141 = 2.7% ----- |
2.7<4.7<5.7 4.0<5.1<6.5 3.7<4.7<5.9 2.7<4.3<6.7 2.6<3.9<5.4 0.89<1.2<1.7 |
p = .0000 X2 = 203, p = .0000 X2 = 29.1, p = .0000 X2 = 1.6, p = .12 |
|
One of Three Categories C vs. W
|
102/1500 = 6.8% W: 67 / 1054 67/1121 = 6.0% C: 35 / 344 35/379 = 9.2% ----- |
162/8099 = 2.0% 131 / 6827 131/6958 = 1.8% 31 / 1110 31/1141 = 2.7% ----- |
2.8<3.4<4.3 2.4<3.2<4.2 2.4<3.2<4.5 2.2<3.6<6.0 2.1<3.4<5.4 1.0<1.6<2.4 |
p = .0000 X2 = 67.7, p = .0000 X2 = 29.1, p = .0000 X2 = 4.7, p = .03 |
|
Two of Three Categories C vs. W
|
67/468 = 14.3% W: 48 / 280 48/328 = 14.6% C: 19 / 121 19/140 = 13.6% ----- |
162/8099 = 2.0% 131 / 6827 131/6958 = 1.8% 31 / 1110 31/1141 = 2.7% ----- |
5.5<7.2<9.4 6.3<8.9<12.7 5.7<7.8<10.6 3.1<5.6<10.2 4 2.9<5.0<8.6 0.51<0.92<1.6 |
p = .0000 X2 = 212, p = .0000 X2 = 39.2, p = .0000 X2 = 0.09, p = .76 |
|
Three Categories C / W
|
30/168 = 17.9% W: 24 / 99 24/123 = 19.5% C: 6 / 39 6/45 = 13.3% ----- |
162/8099 = 2.0% 131 / 6827 131/6958 = 1.8% 31 / 1110 31/1141 = 2.7% ----- |
6.2<8.9<12.8 7.9<12.6<20.4 7.4<24.3<15.7 2.2<5.5<14.0 2.1<4.9<11.2 0.24<0.63<1.7 |
p = .0000 X2 = 175, p = .0000 X2 = 16.1, p = .0000 X2 = 0.86, p = .35 |
|
|
|
Suicide Attempters / Non-attempters Attempters = %F |
Suicide Attempters / Non-attempters Attempters = %F |
Risk Ratio Harassed vs. Non- Harassed 95% CI |
Chi Square: One Degree of Freedom. |
|
One to Three Categories 1 C vs. W 5
|
87/2136 = 4.1% W: 65 / 1507 65/1567 = 4.1% C: 22 / 542 22/564 = 3.9% ----- |
63/8099 = 0.78% 53 / 6905 53/6958 = 0.77% 10 / 1131 10/1141 = 0.88% ----- |
3.8<5.2<7.2 3.9<5.6<8.1 3.8<4.4<9.3 2.2<4.6<9.8 2.1<4.4<9.3 0.59<0.94<1.5 |
p = .0000 X2 = 203, p = .0000 X2 = 18.7, p = .0000 X2 = 0.04, p = .80 |
|
One of Three Categories C vs. W
|
37/1500 = 2.5% W: 26 / 1095 26/1121 = 2.3% C: 11 / 368 11/379 = 2.9% ----- |
63/8099 = 0.78% 53 / 6905 53/6958 = 0.77% 10 / 1131 10/1141 = 0.88% ----- |
2.1<3.2<4.7 1.9<3.1<5.0 1.9<3.0<4.8 1.4<3.4<8.0 1.4<3.3<7.7 0.62<1.3<2.6 |
p = .0000 X2 = 24.2, p = .0000 X2 = 8.6, p = .003 X2 = 0.4, p = .53 |
|
Two of Three Categories C vs. W
|
34/468 = 7.8% W: 25 / 303 25/328 = 8.2% C: 9 / 131 9/140 = 6.4% ----- |
63/8099 = 0.78% 53 / 6905 53/6958 = 0.77% 10 / 1131 10/1141 = 0.88% ----- |
6.3<9.4<14.0 6.6<10.7<17.5 6.3<10.0<15.9 3.1<7.7<19.5 4 3.0<7.3<17.7 0.45<0.79<1.4 |
p = .0000 X2 = 65.6, p = .0000 X2 = 26.3, p = .0000 X2 = 0.21, p = .65 |
|
Three Categories C vs. W
|
16/168 = 9.5% W: 14 / 109 14/123 = 11.4% C: 2 / 43 2/45 = 13.3% ----- |
63/8099 = 0.78% 53 / 6905 53/6958 = 0.77% 10 / 1131 10/1141 = 0.88% ----- |
7.2<12.2<20.7 9.0<14.9<26.2 8.5<24.3<15.7 1.1<5.3<24.7 1.1<5.1<22.5 0.08<0.39<1.8 |
p = .0000 X2 = 48.1, p = .0000 X2 = 16.1, p = .0000 X2 = 1.7, p = .21 |
|
|
|
Med. Attempters / Non-M. Attempters M. Attempters = %F |
Med. Attempters/ Non-M. Attempters M. Attempters = %F |
Risk Ratio Harassed vs. Non- Harassed 95% CI |
Chi Square: One Degree of Freedom. |
|
One to Three Categories 1 C vs. W 5
|
51/2121 = 2.4% W: 43 / 1515 43/1558 = 2.8% C: 8 / 555 8/563 = 1.4% ----- |
47/8037 = 0.58% 39 / 6962 39/7001 = 0.56% 8 / 1128 8/1136 = 0.70 ----- |
2.8<4.1<6.1 3.2<5.0<7.7 3.2<4.9<7.5 0.76<2.0<5.4 0.76<2.0<5.3 1.0<3.8<13.9 |
p = .0000 X2 = 63.8, p = .0000 X2 = 2.1, p = .15 X2 = 3.2, p = .07 |
|
One of Three Categories C vs. W
|
19/1487 = 1.3% W: 16 / 1093 16/1109 = 1.4% C: 3 / 137 3/140 = 2.1% ----- |
47/8037 = 0.58% 39 / 6962 39/7001 = 0.56% 8 / 1128 8/1136 = 0.70 ----- |
1.3<2.2<2.7 1.4<2.5<4.6 1.4<2.5<4.5 0.30<1.1<4.3 0.30<1.1<4.2 0.43<1.5<5.2 |
p = .003 X2 = 10.8, p = .0000 X2 = .03, p = .86 X2 = .41, p = .52 |
|
Two of Three Categories C vs. W
|
22/467 = 4.7% W: 19 / 308 19/327 = 5.8% C: 3 / 137 3/140 = 2.1% ----- |
47/8037 = 0.58% 39 / 6962 39/7001 = 0.56% 8 / 1128 8/1136 = 0.70 ----- |
4.9<8.1<3.2 6.2<10.8<19.0 6.0<10.3<17.6 0.81<3.1<11.8 0.82<3.0<11.3 0.10<.35<1.2 |
p = .0000 X2 = 877, p = .0000 X2 = 3.0, p = .08 X2 = 2.9, p = .09 |
|
Three Categories C vs. W
|
10/167 = 6.0% W: 8 / 114 8/122 = 6.6% C: 2 / 43 2/45 = 4.4% ----- |
47/8037 = 0.58% 39 / 6962 39/7001 = 0.56% 8 / 1128 8/1136 = 0.70 ----- |
5.3<10.2<19.9 5.6<12.3<27.0 5.5<11.6<24.3 1.3<6.6<31.8 1.4<6.3<28.9 0.13<0.66<3.2 |
p = .00000 X2 = 64.7, p = .0000 X2 = 7.2, p = .007 X2 = 0.26, p = 0.61 |
1. Questions Identifying
Three Forms of Harassment:
Question 11: During the past
12 months, have you ever been harassed at school (or on the way to or from
school) because of your race or ethnic origin?
Question 12: During the past
12 months, have you ever been harassed at school (or on the way to and
from school) because someone thought your were gay, lesbian or bisexual?"
Count given, not weighted. The weighted percentage is 7.9% for males harassed,
as opposed to the "8.2%" raw percentage used, meaning that the generated
statistical results are reasonably good approximations of what the results
would be had the calculations been done using the data set.
Question 13: "During the
past 12 months, have you received unwanted sexual comments or attention
at school (or on your way to or from school?)"
2.
Race / Ethnicity: For
the calculation related to "race / ethnicity," results were generated by
using the results for "white" males and male "of color." This latter group
does not include the males (n = 152) who did not answer the question on
race /ethnicity (Question 4), forming about ??? of the sample. Six
of these males had attempted suicide and were not included in suicidality
analyses based on race / ethnicity, such as the analysis of males who responded
with a "yes" or a No" to the three harassment questions: Questions
11- 13. Male "of color" answered affirmatively to any of the following
in Question 4: "How do you describe yourself? (Select one or more
responses.) Am Indian / Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American,
Hispanic or Latino, Native Hawaiian/other, Multiple - Hispanic, Multiple
- Non-hispanic." White males answered affirmatively to the "White" option
only. "A" = All Males, "W" = White Males, and "C" = Males Of Color.
3. Statistics:
The Odd Ratios are calculated at a "95% Confidence Interval" from a two-by-two
table which, in this case (Table 4a), consists of 199 suicide attempters
/ 1937 non-attempters in "harassed male" category and 162 suicide attempters
/ 7937 non-attempters in the "non-harassed" male category, producing an
OR of 4.1<5.0<6.2. The Pearson's Chi Square value (X2)
in this case indicates that the difference between the two paired values
would be due to a chance event less than one time in 10,000: p = .0000.
The Risk Ratio, also calculated at a "95% Confidence Internval," is the
relationship between the suicide attempt incidence in the two categories.
In Table 4b, the Odd Ratios and Risk Ratios are calculated on the basis
of the multiple suicide attempters. In Table 4c, the calculations are based
on the suicide attempters reporting having received medical attention related
to their suicide attempt(s).
4. C vs. W: Comparing
the Odds of attempting suicide for males of color and white males in the
specified category to detemine if the difference would be statistically
significant: p is less than or qual to .05.
|
|
One's Race or Ethnicity |
Orientation is Assumed |
Sexually-Related |
| "White" & "Of Color" Males: Comparing Suicide Attempter(s) for all males responding with a "Yes" or "No" in three harassment categories. |
|
Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
|
OR 4 = 2.2<3.6<4.6 X2 = 130, p = .000 9.7% (105/1082) 2.8% (262/9,282) |
4.5<5.7<7.2 X2 = 266, p = .0000 13.4% (115/858) vs. 2.6% (252/9,490) |
3.4<4.2<5.3 X2 = 175, p = .0000 10.7% (114/1069) vs 2.7% (253/9,242) |
|
2.9<4.1<5.8 X2 = 73.3, p = .0008 4.4% (48/1082) 1.1% (104/9,282) |
4.4<6.2<8.8 X2 = 86.6, p = .0000 %F = 6.2% (53/858) vs. 1.0% (99/9,490) |
3.9<5.5<7.7 X2 = 124, p = .0000 %F = 5.3% (57/1069) 1.0% (94/9,242) |
|
2.1<3.3<5.1 X2 = 30.4, p = .0000 2.5% (27/1072) vs. 0.79% (72/9,210) |
3.7<5.7<8.7 X2 = 82.3, p = .0000 3.9% (33/852) vs. 0.70% (66/9,415) |
3.1<4.6<7.1 X2 = 62.1, p = .0000 3.2% (34/1058) vs. 0.71% (65/9,172) |
|
|
Odd Ratios (95% CI) 6 Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
Orientation is Assumed Odd Ratios (95% CI) 6 Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
Sexually-Related Odd Ratios (95% CI) 6 Suicide Attempt Incidences: Harassed vs. Non-Harassed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0<4.0<5.4
|
1.6<2.4<3.7
|
4.4<5.8<7.6
|
3.3<5.3<8.5
|
3.8<4.9<6.4
|
1.6<2.6<4.3
|
|
3.2<4.8<7.3
|
1.2<2.5<5.0
|
4.0<5.9<8.7
|
3.1<6.4<13.3
|
4.4<6.5<9.4
|
3.2<4.8<7.3
|
|
Medical care 2.5<4.1<6.8
|
Medical care 0.68<1.9<5.2
|
Medical care 3.8<5.9<9.2
|
Medical care 1.6<4.6<13.5
|
Medical care 3.5<5.5<8.7
|
Medical care 0.68<2.1<6.7
|
![]()
On
October 6, 1998, in a news item titled "UK 'Teachers bully gay pupils'"
BBC
News reported that some teachers abuse boys known (or believed)
to be gay, thus creating and/or exacerbating problems - including suicide
problems - for these adolescent. Anecdotal suicide-related information
is given. (Alternate
article link.) - A 1996 double lesbian
youth suicide.
![]()
Schools
accused of abandoning thousands of gay children to classroom bullies:
Homophobic abuse is driving many pupils out of education, researchers say.
(The Guardian, May 9, 2005): " "This sort of thing happened pretty much
every day for 18 months," said the 15-year-old, who left school a year
early because of the relentless bullying. "I often had chairs thrown at
me in class and was kicked and punched in the corridor. It was something
I just had to deal with." Steven, from Birmingham, is one of tens of thousands
of gay pupils who have been forced to abandon their studies because of
what campaigners describe as the "endemic" abuse of gay and lesbian pupils
across the country. The gay rights group Stonewall estimates that more
than 60,000 gay and lesbian pupils are victims of homophobic abuse that
can range from name-calling to serious physical and sexual assaults..."
![]()
![]()
A survey of UK teachers has found a "deeply alarming" amount of homophobia in schools (2009). - FIT against homophobic bullying
(2010): In an ongoing battle to tackle homophobic bullying in British
schools, LGBT charity Stonewall will be sending every secondary school
in Britain a copy of FIT, the first feature film for schools to tackle
homophobic bullying.
![]()
Non-Normative
Gender and Sexual Identities in Schools: An Exploration of the
Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual (and (Transgender) Individuals in
British Schools (Dissertation, 2008, Amy Macmillan, PDF, PDF):
Yes, explicit queerphobic bullying needs to be challenged and we need
pro-active and preventative anti-bullying campaigns, rather than
isolated and inconsistent reactions to specifics events, but this needs
to be accompanied by understandings of why this behaviour is wrong and
why LGBT identities should not be marginalised or discriminated
against. No more policy is needed, the framework is there, instead we
need to look at how Safe to Learn (DCFS, 2007a [Safe to Learn: Embedding anti-bullying work in schools, PDF])
can be successfully integrated into schools antibullying cultures, how
schools can learn from past failures by recognising and understanding
the experiences of their past and current LGBT pupils and how cultural
shifts can be encouraged to create an inclusive environment for
everybody. - Homophobic bullying at the centre of election debate
(2010): Labour have today revealed their election manifesto, which
promises that more money will be invested in tackling homophobic
bullying in schools and a commitment to compulsory "high quality" sex
education if the party is returned to power. - An inclusive culture: challenging homophobic and sexist bullying (2010).
![]()
'Suicide
wish' of gay bullying victims (07/18/00, BBC):
"A large proportion of lesbian, gay and bisexual pupils who are bullied
by their classmates try to commit suicide, according to research.
A study suggests that half of them contemplate killing or harming themselves,
and four in 10 actually harm themselves at least once... The research also
indicates that 17% - nearly one in five - display symptoms associated with
post-traumatic stress disorder later in life... The findings by Dr Ian
Rivers, of the College of Ripon and York St John, were being presented
to The British Psychological Society's Lesbian and Gay Section Conference
at the University of Surrey on Tuesday. " - Information
related to research carried out by Ian Rivers. - Summary
of River's Research Related to Homophobic Bullying and its Long-Term Negative
Effects N/A.
![]()
Dispelling
the Myths by Chris Morris:
"I was 15 when I decided to come out at school. The first step was pretty
easy: I told a gossip who I knew would spread the word quickly. I knew
he had finished when he joined the growing crowd and played his part in
the macho performance - 'We don't like your sort!' As the insults turned
into threats to my life, one teacher was heard sneering, 'Oh well, he did
say he was a homo. What else did he expect?'" - Homophobia and
heterosexism (2008): There are those who are overtly homophobic, those who are
subtly homophobic and those who are perpetuating the problem without
even realising it. Report investigates homophobic bullying in education. - British Teen Driven To Suicide Over Gay Taunts (2008) N/A:
British police are investigating the suicide of a 14-year girl who had
been subjected to constant bullying by classmates who called her a
lesbian. The body of Belinda Allen was discovered by a man walking his
dog in Southwater. Police said the teen had tied a scarf around her
neck and hanged herself from a tree. It is not known if the girl
identified as being gay but she had suffered taunting and bullying for
more than a year friends said on Thursday.- 'Lesbian' jibes drive 14-yr-old to suicide (2008). - Girl is second pupil found hanged after suffering taunts by bullies (2008). - ‘This is why we need a GSA’ (2008).
![]()
Anti-gay
bullies 'given free rein' (07/02/00, BBC):
(Alternate
Link) - "Homophobic abuse and bullying is rife in schools because teachers
are inhibited by the law banning the promotion of homosexuality [by Clause
28], according to research from a leading educational institute. Confidential
interviews with teachers have revealed that they choose to ignore the problem
because of uncertainty regarding their legal position - so bullies feel
they can act with impunity, the research suggests... Consequently gentle
boys or 'tomboy' girls become targets. 'Boys struggle to avoid being
called 'gay', 'poofta', 'bumboy', 'queer' or whatever the local term of
abuse is,' said Dr Epstein." - Takling Homophobic Bullying: an issue for every teacher (2004, PDF Download. PDF Download.
![]()
Note:
The reason given for ongoing anti-gay bullying - Clause 28 - may NOT be
true. Teachers in Canada, US, Australia, and other countries all have a
general history of ignoring - even encouraging - and sometimes participating
in - anti-gay bullying of students, and especially students manifesting
any behavior (usually gender non-conformity) or attitudes indicating /
suggesting that they may NOT be heterosexual. Example: Teen
sues school district over anti-gay harassment (Associated Press - 06/26/00):
"A 17-year-old northwestern Pennsylvania boy is suing a school district
for failing to intervene with anti-gay harassment he said drove him to
try to commit suicide... The lawsuit, brought June 8 in federal court in
Erie, says Dahle realized he was gay or bisexual when he was in sixth grade.
He claimed that since that time he was subjected to name-calling, obscene
jokes and physical assaults. Dahle said in the suit that he reported the
harassment to school administrators, but no one did anything to help."
![]()
He's
Not A Freak, He's My Son:
"After the tragic suicide of a 15 year old boy, taunted by homophobic bullies
at school, a mother tells us HER story... He was about four years old when
I first noticed he was different... He went on to say that it was because
my son behaved DIFFERENTLY that he was being bullied. 'Some pupils seem
to attract the bullies,' the teacher said. ' Your son doesn't behave like
the other boys.' ...One thing that sticks in my mind more than anything
is the day I saw a teenage boy point to me and say 'That's the 'FREAK'S'
mother.'
![]()
Straight
Talk - Newsletter of the Gay Men's Health Wiltshire and Swindon
(2000) - "Try to imagine yourself as a young person going through the emotional
turmoil of puberty. Add to this the feelings of being different,
or actually being attracted to people of the same sex.
All your life you have been told that gay men are perverted and are the
object of ridicule. How do you feel? You can’t change what you are feeling
inside, so what can you do?"
![]()
For
information about adolescent suicidality as related to anti-gay harassment,
see Bagley C, D'Augelli A (2000). Suicidal behaviour in gay,
lesbian, and bisexual youth (Editorial). British Medical Journal, 320,
1617-8 (Full
Text).
![]()
What
do they think? Queerly raised and queer-friendly students - by
Maria Pallotta-Chiarolli (Youth Studies Australia, 19(4), 2000 (December):
34-40. Abstract: "Homophobia and heterosexism still rule in most classrooms
and playgrounds although an increasing number of children and young people
are being raised to be queer friendly. Maria Pallotta-Chiarolli discusses
the insights of primary and secondary queer friendly students into the
questions of why homophobia is still an issue among student populations;
what kind of anti-homophobic strategies work; what strategies and approaches
are required; and what they believe their role is in a whole-school approach
to homophobia and heteronormativity."
![]()
Book
shows how homophobia starts in the schoolyard (New Release 11/11/99,
University of Maryland): "In primary school, boys are likely to be
accused of being a poofter if they mix with girls too often, and accused
of the same thing in high school if they don't mix with them enough...
homophobia peaks in the mid to late teens, with boys in years 8 and 9 reporting
that they use the word 'poofter' 25 to 50 times a day. These attitudes,
he said, were often an exaggerated expression of heterosexual identity,
and thus effected everyone... Boys who aren't targeted by others observe
what goes on and make sure they don't do anything that might be considered
suspect or that would make them stand out. Masculine behaviours are exaggerated
and these lead to all sorts of lifestyle and risk behaviours which endure
later in life... At the furthest behaviour extreme were gay-hate murders,
with some research suggesting that as many as one in four murders involving
strangers in New South Wales over the last 20 years were in some way related
to homophobia.
![]()
Flood M, Hamilton C (2005). Mapping Homophobia in Australia. Australia: The Australia Institute for a Just, sustainable, Peaceful Future (PDF)...
The effects of homophobia on young people are especially worrying as
harassment and violence against same-sex attracted youth (SSAY) can
scar them for life. According to a recent study, SSAY in Australia
account for between five and 11 per cent of the relevant population. It
has been estimated that they are six times more likely to attempt
suicide than the population as a whole. Homophobic attitudes and
behaviours have been shown to be prevalent in schools, putting SSAY at
risk of discrimination, victimisation and violence. According to one
study:
… the place at which the abuse was most likely to occur was school (69%) with boys more likely to be abused there than girls (81% vs 53%). The streets were the second most likely place of abuse (47%) followed by social (34%) and sporting events (9%). … Fifty nine percent of those who had been verbally or physically abused named other students as the perpetrators. Added to this, 10% named friends, some of whom were also likely to be school students. - Reference: Lynne Hillier et al., Writing Themselves In: A National Report on the Sexuality, Health and Well-Being of Same-Sex attracted Young People, Melbourne, Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health & Society, Latrobe University, 2002 [PDF]. See also NSW Teachers Federation, Education Online: Creating safe and supportive environments, 2003. http://www.nswtf.org.au/edu_online/51/createsafe.html. [See:Writing Themselves in Again 6 years on, 2005, PDF, Download Page]. Related Article: Student gay bashing rife, says report (2005). - Coming out getting easier for gay teenagers (2005). Summary of the Hillier et al. (2005) study in the National LGBT Health Alliance Submission (2009, PDF): Hiller et al. concluded from their Australian survey of the health and wellbeing of same-sex attracted young people, that the high prevalence of family and peer rejection, harassment, and bullying fuelled feelings of isolation, self-loathing and shame - all of which have been shown to substantially increase vulnerability to suicide and self-harm. Specific findings of the study included that: • over half the respondents had been verbally or physically abused because of their sexuality; • school was the place where most of that abuse took place; and • the majority of respondents felt unsafe in many different environments including school, at home and in the community. The levels of violence experienced by same-sex attracted young people increased between 1998 and 2005, escalating in schools particularly.
![]()
Speaking Out: Stopping Homophobic and Transphobic Abuse in Queensland - 2010 - by Alan Berman & Shirleene Robinson.
Based on the largest survey of gay, lesbian, bisexual, intersex, transgender and queer reactions to violence and harassment ever undertaken in Australia, this book gives voice to the many victims who have suffered in the state once recognised as Australia's most homophobic. It tells of the barriers people face in dealing with the legal system, the reasons why some do not report their experiences , and the complex historical, religious and educational factors affecting the perpetuation of homophobia across the country. Most importantly it provides a roadmap forward for all Australian legislative, policing, and judicial jurisdictions via a wide ranging set of recommendations, from the individual's understanding of their rights and responsibilities, to the responses of police, legal professionals and judicial officers.
Comparable countries are dealing with homophobia in schools much more effectively than we are. While we have good work happening across disparate sectors, we need to anchor these initiatives and focus this work with strong campaigns in the education sector. Working with the education sector, the health sector, as well as human rights and equal opportunity initiatives and the justice system is imperative. We need to generate multiple leverage points for positive social change in this area. The development of a Safe Schools Coalition is an appropriate and effective implementation of this approach. It will allow a range of organizations and interest groups to work towards a clear and irrefutable goal - a young person’s right to a safe and inclusive education. This will include inviting young people to actively shape school culture, strategies and policies around sexual diversity and challenging homophobia... The basic tenet of the Australian education system is that all young people have the right to be educated in an environment in which they feel safe and valued. Research shows that the reality is quite different. School is an unsupportive and unsafe place for many young people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT), or who are either perceived to be LGBT or challenge heterosexist norms .
The homophobia expressed towards boys who do not ‘measure up’ to dominant forms of masculinity is frequently related to their similarity to girls, and commonly in terms derogatory to females (Epstein, 1997: Kenway & Willis, 1998: Lees. 1997). Drawing upon what Lees (1993) identifies as a “vocabulary of abuse,” these boys are, for example, commonly labelled and referred to as: “sissies,” “girls,” “poofs,” “poofters,” “faggots,” “fags,” “bumboys,” and “Nancyboys.” Essentially. engagement with these homophobic practices - along with other normalising techniques of surveillance - are clearly used by boys to enhance their heterosexual masculine reputation, and to police the boundaries of acceptable male behaviour and identity as well as homosexual behaviour (see Jordan, 1995: Kessler et al., 1985: Mac An Ghaill, 1994: Mahony, 1989: Martino, 1995a, 1995b, 1995c, 1995d, 2000a, 2000b, 2000c, 2000d: Martino & Frank, 2006: Nayak & Kehily, 1996, 1997: Redman & Mac An Ghaill, 1996: Skeggs, 1991: Stanley, 1986: Stanworth, 1983). Clearly, to resist dominant codes of masculinity within the school site, and more specifically within the classroom, is a precarious business - it is to risk being labelled “gay.” Given this, boys are, as Nayak & Kehily (1996) suggest, encouraged to “perform their gendered identities in particular ways to survive the prospect of homophobic abuse” (p. 216) and to cultivate a “hyper-hetero sexual identity” (p. 212). As is later demonstrated in this paper, the use of heterosexist language practices serves as a tool in the achievement of this masculinist identity.
|
|
| Visitor Numbers |
| Top of Page |
|
|